I saw a cartoon the other
day that just bowled me over with its honesty.
It was a picture of Attorney General Eric Holder, at a podium, with the
seal of the Department of Justice in the background. The caption read "The Department of
Just-Us" which, of course, is exactly the way it works now. He has lied to Congress, and been caught at
it, and didn't even miss a night's sleep over it. The DOJ, under Holder's direction, is suing
the state of North Carolina over voting requirements. It seems that the state wants to require a
picture ID in order to vote. Well, what
is the problem here? We have to have a
picture ID to buy alcohol, to get a plane ticket, to buy a gun...just about
anything, so what's gotten his back up?
I'll tell you. He is claiming
that its racial discrimination because black people can't get picture ID's,
The DOJ plans to ask a
federal judge to place four provisions in North Carolina’s voting law under
federal scrutiny for an indefinite period of time. The suit would claim that the North Carolina
statute violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and would seek to have the
state subject to federal pre-clearance before making "future
voting-related changes." Additionally, the DOJ suit also takes aim at
the law's requirement that voters present government-issued identification at
the polls in order to vote. The North Carolina state board of elections
recently found that hundreds of thousands of registered voters — mostly the
young, poor, elderly, or minorities — do not have a state-issued ID. By the way, according to a North Carolina
website, it only costs $10 to get a picture identification card. I'm pretty sure that's within everybody's
budget since it's a one-time charge.
Analysts wonder, however, why the administration did not take such
“appropriately aggressive action” five years ago against efforts to hinder
voting at Philadelphia polls by members of the New Black Panthers. And while the new Black Panthers continue to
go unpunished for intimidating voters at the polls, Attorney General Holder has
targeted the June Supreme Court ruling that attempts to free specific states
from selective scrutiny as “deeply flawed."
How's this for a brilliant idea? Let's have Muslim-free zones. They'll be just like Sharia-controlled zones,
only in reverse. There will be package
stores and bars, movie theatres, restaurants that serve pork products, and
music will emanate from all sorts of places.
Women will wear mini-skirts, if their figures warrant it, and men will
be clean-shaven for the most part and, most important, people will bathe on a
regular basis. Goats will not be objects
of desire, inbreeding will be frowned upon and religious worship will be on a
voluntary basis. Headgear will consist
of hats, baseball-style caps or other appropriate coverings, but will
definitely not be a towel or sheet wrapped around the head. Rape will be considered a heinous crime
AGAINST a women, not one perpetrated BY
a woman, and certainly not requiring 4 male witnesses. Testimony in court will have equal weight for
men and women and, in cases of inheritance, women shall recieve their full
share and not a half-share as under Sharia law.
Honor killings will be considered as murder and the killer shall get a
fair trial, something that the victim certainly did not. If, for any reason, Muslims see this
proposal as being discriminatory, that would show that they are above-average
in intelligence, but should stay out of the Muslim-free zones anyhow. While no harm would come to a Muslim who
happened to find himself or herself in a Muslim-free zone, they might be
OFFENDED by the amount of freedom being bandied about. Oh, wait a minute...no Muslim woman would be
allowed out of the house unescorted, so we needn't worry about them.
I'm not much of a movie fan, and very few make an
impression on me...but I'll tell you one that did, and does. It's called V For
Vendetta and although it takes place in the United Kingdom, it could
very well take place here...and might, if the people will just wake up and see
what's happening to America. Briefly,
it's the story of an over-powering government...much like our current
government, with a lot of Big Brother thrown in. One man decides he's had enough and begins to
harass the government, to the point where they notice him, and want him taken
care of because he's about to spill the beans about Mr. Big, who is a really
bad guy. If you have not seen this
movie, I suggest that you rent it or buy it...and watch it a couple of
times. It's brutal in spots, but it is
not gratuitous brutality...just your ordinary brutality.
If you read this...how about some comments?
Larry Usoff, US Navy, Ret.
No comments:
Post a Comment